Spiritual Markers

Jan 20, 2007

Jeff

8 Comments

Birth certificate vs. driver’s license

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting! Feel free to leave comments. Your participation enriches the site!

Scott McKnight nails it on the head in his book, Jesus Creed:

For some, conversion is like a birth certificate while for others it is like a driver’s license. For the first, the ultimate question is, “What do I need to do to get to heaven?” For the second, the question is, “How do I love God?” For the first, the concern is a moment; for the second, the concern is a life.

Dean had a great post here this past week related to discipleship, and I think McKnight’s quote follows that up well. I’m still chewing through his book (Scott’s – I’m still waiting on Dean’s to be published), and loving the ultimate simplicity of the Christ-follower’s life being focused on LOVE.

• Love God.
• Love people.

Everything else falls into place.

I certainly don’t want to be overly harsh or produce doubt in needless places, but the average American church-goer, whether current or past, needs to truly reexamine their supposed profession of faith. I don’t know that NOT going to hell is actually a motivation that produces repentance and receives the full gift of God’s grace through salvation.

Jesus tells us, as do the apostles, that repentance is involved in this willing decision of faith to place one’s life in the gracious and loving arms of our Creator in Christ. Merely trying to save ourselves from damnation, without any shred of devotion and ambition to surrender one’s life to Christ is a dubious “conversion” at best. It may not even produce a birth certificate. Rather, it may be closer to the seed that fell on rocky soil in Jesus’ parable.

It is healthy to search your heart occasionally as to the true nature and evidence of your faith. Were you simply trying to escape punishment, or were you genuinely trusting Christ with your life and intending to follow Him? The New Testament urges our certainty at this point.

I’ve heard so many church-goers assert “I believe in Jesus” or “I asked Jesus into my heart,” or “I’ve accepted Jesus as my personal Lord and Savior” and just not seen the fruit that should come from those life realignments. At the very least, they ought to be concerned that language like “asking Jesus into my heart,” and “accepting Jesus” is not found in the New Testament in any of the passages relating to salvation. Rather, salvation is always accompanied by the unlimited kindness and grace of Christ in association with our recognition of Him as King, Lord, Christ and our accompanying repentance.

Some may be scratching their heads, wondering and conflicted about this issue of repentance. “I thought you just had to believe?” you may ask. You do. And you don’t. You see, there is obviously a kind of belief that results in action and adoration, while there’s another kind of belief that results in mere intellectual assent. One kind says, “I believe and will change.” The other kind says, “I believe and recognize the reality of the situation, but…” This latter belief is not ready to submit to or receive Christ as Lord. In James 2.19, we are told, “You believe that God is one. You do well; the demons also believe, and shudder.”

So what kind of belief do you have? Do you have proof of birth? Better yet, are you licensed to drive?

On this day...

• Proof of prayer's effectiveness - 2011
• A little closure... - 2009

Share

Possibly Related Posts:

• Your status is your standard
• Live like those who cannot die
• Engage in business
• A big but…
• Preachers liking liquor

8 Comments

• 
  Widebody January 20, 2007 at 7:09 pm

  I appreciate your post. That is a nice concise argument that, given poor writing skills like mine, could easily dawdle on into a 20 page essay. I think the issue is a matter of saying “OK” to God. He calls. We answer. That call and answer are different for every person, and the results from that interaction are different for every person. I believe that it is absolutely possible for a person to bear fruit that is not “really” considered fruit by the modern church. Peace, patience, kindness, gentleness, self-control … but come on … let’s look around at ourselves and our church leaders, pastors, elders, deacons, etc… It seems that many of us are not exactly exhuding the fruits of the Spirit. Our view of fruit is more, “Well, did he quit cussing?”, or “Did he start soul-winning?”, and “Did he start really appreciating going to church?”. I think that a relationship with God brings about definite change and produces fruit in the life of a believer, but we seem to so blur what fruit really is. It is definite that understading all about God and “praying” will never bring salvation, but a true relationship doesn’t necessarily give us the “abracadabra alakazamm … now you are a Christian man!” I believe that salvation is a process and it would take a much keener eye than mine to determine which stalks are the wheat and which are the chaff. I also know that the wheat is going to the storehouse, but the chaff … it’s gonna burn.
  There’s my 2 cents.
  Now that is what I call dawdling on.
  Thanks again for the good post.

  Reply
• 
  Richard Pool January 21, 2007 at 2:20 am

  Hi Jeff,
  A couple of things come to mind. Firstly I guess you’re touching on the age old evangelical problem of separating justification from sanctification, something that doesn’t happen in the New Testament, but has happened in evangelical theology. Personally I think we can trace the historical reasons for this but I won’t bore you with a lesson in church history right now!
  Secondly, when you do the first act of separating, you are then forced to turn conversion into an issue of “saved from” because you’re only dealing with the issues of escaping punishment. We fail to address the issue of “saved to” and hence fail to address the need for lifestyle changes that are congruent with a new relationship with God.

  Reply
• 
  Jeff January 21, 2007 at 6:11 pm

  Excellent distinction, Richard, and a helpful reminder for this discussion regarding sanctification/justification.

  I’ve always liked the expression about how we have been saved, we are being saved, and we will be saved.

  However, for the entry at hand, I sincerely hope that people will reflect deeply on whether they’re saved, according to the New Testament. As I said, I don’t mean to elevate doubt, but rather to encourage honest and holy introspection. I believe scripture encourages it.

  On another note, just as the issue of profanity is a cultural one between the States and the UK (as it would be any where), so also this issue of mistaken salvation may be more heightened by the area in which I minister (aka, the Bible Belt of the states). I’ve written >several posts about the difficulty of ministering in this intensely faux-religious context. It almost seems at time that you have to convince folks that they’re not saved here in order to hold out to them the gracious and loving truth of the Gospel.

  But I encourage you and others to weigh in again on this topic. Anything that we might all do that might bring fruit to the lives of Christians and to the kingdom is worth the mental meandering.

  Reply
• 
  Richard Pool January 22, 2007 at 3:11 am

  The most significant verse in the Bible for me on my journey towards faith was “Let a man examine himself” (1Cor.11:28 if memory serves. This was my moment of clarity when I realsied I needed to make a decision. So “holy introspection” worked for me!
  On the cultural differences about mistaken salvation, I suspect that there are many similarities-poor theology, lack of clear witness, folklore thinking, shallow faith experiences etc-but the biggest difference still lies in church attendence. In the UK only 5-7% of the adult population attend church on a regualr basis, and for those that do, once a month would be considered regular.

  Reply
• 
  TJ January 22, 2007 at 10:54 am

  We have the same issues here in Kentucky. Everybody is supposedly “saved”. You ask them when they got saved, they say it was when they were 15 at a Christian concert, but when it comes down to it, they only said some words, but didn’t’ make a commitment. You ask them where they go to church, they say, “oh i don’t know the name of it, but it’s that church down on the corner of salt lick and lickskillet” Then you ask them who their pastor is, they can’t tell you that either.

  My pastor here says that the challenge around here isn’t getting people saved, it’s getting people lost, so they can see their need for salvation.

  Reply
• 
  dean January 25, 2007 at 12:20 am

  i think there is such a gross under-estimation on the part of many professing Christians, of exactly what it cost for Jesus to redeem us. several (jeff and tj) have commented on the state of faith of those here in the deep south USA, and i really believe that the old saying “familiarity breeds contempt” is so true in this part of the country as it applies to faith matters. when i was a bi-vocational youth minister in MS, i also had a paint contracting business, and was partners with a couple of other contractors. we had some of the most morally bankrupt people working for us that i’ve ever met in my life. but to a man, every single one of them would tell you that they were raised “Christian” and claim membership in some church somewhere, even though they havent darkened the doorway of that or any other church building in decades. not that i’m trying to equate church attendance or membership with salvation, but the point they would make is that they are “OK with the big man upstairs” precisely because their name is on some church roll somewhere.

  and you dont have to be living in the gutter to have this mindset either. folks consider it a part of their DNA or something, or part of their inheritance from their family that they are, in their mind, “Christian” because their parents and grandparents were, and they’re merely following in their footsteps… carrying on some tradition. there is no recognition of the ultimate price that was paid to make a way for us to be children of God… there is no sense of urgency on the part of many self-professed Christians to be HOLY. ultimately, for many, the price that Jesus paid for our lives has been cheapened by an “easy believism”. yes, we are saved by grace through faith (the birth certificate), but it is out of a sense of gratitude to the Father for the price that was paid for that “free” gift that comes the desire to want to love and serve God (the driver’s license). salvation may be free, but it didnt come cheap.

  Reply
• 
  Esbeida October 13, 2011 at 12:03 pm

  I can honestly say that my “salvation” was motivated by fear of dying & burning. Shortly after I read the New Testament, something didn’t seem right about repeating a prayer & that being my ticket to heaven. Thankfully the Lord lead me to meet wonderful leaders & friends ever since & I know now that just a prayer at the alter is not salvation.
  That last point you make about believing is very crucial in our walk with Christ. This is where we get it wrong, the definition of believing is unclear to many or we choose to ignore it in order to live the life we want. This was Esbeida for a long time.
  Thanks for such a great entry, I’m printing it off & use it as a topic for SS. Miss y’all!

  Reply
• 
  Jeff November 28, 2011 at 9:41 pm

  Great to hear from you, Esbeida! Thanks for stopping by and for the encouraging comments and snippet of your testimony!

  Reply

Leave a comment

Click here to cancel reply.

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

Comment

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail