Birth control
February 3rd, 2007 Posted in Snippets
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
Leave it to Tim to attempt an entry, oops, article, about birth control…
4 Responses to “Birth control”
Leave a Reply
- posted a photo
(and 29 more...)
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
(and 1 more...)
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
(and 4 more...)
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
(and 19 more...)
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
- posted a photo
Jeff's Lifestream
On October 13, 2008
On October 12, 2008
Traffic/Stats
See Trail Traffic
- 5 Users Online
- Who hates me? (1 viewing now)
- Music Survey... (1 viewing now)
- Tips for a great sermon misses mark (1 viewing now)
- Just for moms... (1 viewing now)
- Huckabee to announce presidential bid (1 viewing now)
- Time says the Bible should be taught in schools... (1 viewing now)
- Dancing with the Stars in Monticello (1 viewing now)
- Pulaski Academy football featured on ESPN.com (1 viewing now)
- Apple sells 1.6 million Macs, nearly 1 million notebooks (1 viewing now)
- An apology and sales tax update (1 viewing now)
- Why I'm not a Hog fan (24)
- To go or not to go... to church (23)
- Pain in the &*(%# (22)
- Our Story, ruining the Metro (20)
- When it's time to leave your church (19)
- The use of profanity (17)
- Religious differences between political parties (16)
- Please leave a message... (15)
- Dear Kelloggs/Malt-O-Meal... (15)
- iGot an iPhone!!! (14)
CLASSIC POSTS
LAST YEAR
ONLINE NOW
THEY'RE READING
OTHER TIDBITS
LINK LOVE
Incoming links... add yours by linking!
October 5th, 2007 at 10:50 pm
such a tough issue. It was overwhelming to read through some of the comments.. but I guess I’m on middle ground. I can’t imagine God wanting us to continue having children when we can’t keep a rough over their heads, food in their stomachs, or even keep them in our custody b/c we can’t provide for them. I think it’s far too easy to just throw out “God provides.” I’m sure the dying of starvation infants in third world countries didn’t get that memo… I guess I’ll put myself out there and say I think avoiding pregnancy is smart for many people for many reasons. Take me, I’ve already had 3 csections… having one more is accpetable, but after that it’s quite risky. God gave us brains along with the Bible. There was no such thing as the birth control pill, tubal ligation, or vasectomy in biblical times so it’s hard to say what would’ve been said about them. What about natural family planning? (avoiding intercourse during fertile times) Is that considered wrong too? Seriously.. I think it’s a bit silly to think that God WANTS us to just throw caution to the wind and keep having children until our homes explode. Not to offend anyone.. just my humble opinion!
October 5th, 2007 at 11:08 pm
okay.. I guess I can’t edit my post.. realized some typos.. mainly “rough over their heads” obviously it should be “roof.” Cut me some slack.. I haven’t slept in 4 months ;)
October 6th, 2007 at 5:20 pm
Another one that I am on the fence,so to speak,about as well….Of course,everyone knows I find the Duggars very interesting-as well as their philosophy,but,could everyone do that?I think not!
October 8th, 2007 at 8:03 am
I think having “teen” in the number of children you have is insane. Whether or not you are financially capable of supporting them is a moot point.
You can’t possibly spend quality one on one time with thirteen, fourteen, fifteen children. There’s not enough hours in the day. Wanting that many children makes me think some people are trying to compensate for some void they have, to feel needed or something.
My dad is number 11 of 12 kids. All full siblings, from the same parents, with no multiple births. Although they are a very close bunch, I don’t think the hardships were worth doing that to the kids. In our society we don’t want our kids to “want” for anything. Well, what about when they “need” for things?
Like ATTENTION?