Inspired by Jeremy, I dug up an old Facebook tag. For those of you used to expecting distinguished and profound posts from me, you’ll be so disappointed… For those of you who know me, this will assure you that I am still not distinguished and profound. I intercepted a note in 5th or 6th grade [...]
Sales tax campaign
The LERG in Monticello are preparing to begin an all-out onslaught on our common sense. The Advance released this week the first in an “installment” that seeks to account for the $15 million that the past 10 years of sales tax raised, but for me it raised more questions than it answered. I’m wondering if the Advance has been recruited as a promotional tool. So many of the businessmen that are backing this sales tax advertise with the Advance that they may not have a real choice.
There are no detailed plans for the expenditures of this proposed sales tax.
Unfortunately, at this point, I am growing more and more convinced that not only do we not need to extend the existing sales tax, but that the tactics that will soon be used by some of our city’s leaders are disconcerting.
In some recent minutes from a MEDC meeting, the following showed up as one of the topics:
Do not give the opposition time to prepare a defense.
Buttons have been ordered, and I suppose you’ll be able to recognize the LERG very soon by the shiny buttons they’ll be sporting all over town. Please remember that those buttons are saying, “We have no long-range plan for the city. We simply think the city will be unable to provide necessary services if the tax is not passed.” What services will not be provided is not answered. I have yet to understand from any conversations why so this minority of businessmen and members of the city council and mayor feel that the city cannot simply be run through normal revenues that every city brings in.
I’d encourage you to read the article in the Advance and then begin asking yourself, “Did we get our money’s worth?” Was it worth it? I’d also ask some strong “Why’s?” Was the $4.3 million that supposedly went to “economic development” well spent? Why does the city subsidize the MEDC and the Chamber of Commerce to the tune of $65,000 annually? The article says that $2.8 million was appropriated for the sports complex, but did all of that money get spent out there? On what? Here’s another thought: only $3 million of the total was spent on capital improvements. However, almost $1 million was spent by the MEDC building the SPEC building that still sits empty (and they’re still making payments on it). I’m sure that you can come up with your own questions, as well.
The plan to extend the tax another 15 years – with no definite plans attached to it is almost like saying, “Give the city a blank check for millions of dollars, and it will be spent it well.” After reading the first article, I’m not so sure. It’s also very interesting that just a short time before this special election, we are finally receiving details about how the money was spent. I’ve asked for that information for months for MonticelloLive, but never received it.
Please remember that we already have another one cent tax that goes to the county and another one cent tax that goes to the city. This sales tax extension is for the third cent that we’re already paying. In other words, we pay 6% for the state sales tax, 1% for county, 1% for city, and another 1% on this special sales tax. That brings our local rate to 9%.
Another thing that is VERY disturbing is the total lack of advance notice that the community is being given to participate in discussion about the sales tax. Yes, the LERG have fanned out across Monticello and spoken at the Rotary, Lions’ Club (next meeting), and other civic organizations and meetings, but it seems more of a sales job rather than a dialogue. However, the Advance that was printed last Wednesday (and most of us don’t get it until Thursday) announced two important and serious opportunities to discuss with the Community Design Center from Fayetteville. However, when were the meetings scheduled? For last Thursday at 6:00 p.m. and that Friday at 5:30 p.m! For most of us, it becomes nearly impossible to participate on such short notice. It’s almost like they want to be able to say, “Well, we did have meetings, but not many showed up.”
It just doesn’t sit right. Oh wait, I forgot… if the strategy is to “not give the opposition time to prepare a defense,” then it makes perfect sense.
Personally, I’d like to keep a little more of my money and ask the city to scale back, if need be. Until we see our county officials and our city officials begin to sit down and work together for the future of our community and region, I don’t think it’s time to pass another sales tax. Give us a break. No plan, no tax.
On this day...
- Settling into Blacksburg - 2009
- New look for Notes - 2007
- Extreme Homemakeover introduces materialism? - 2007
- Yancey on prayer - 2007
More entries from Sales Tax Series series
- Review: CrazyOnDigital Folio Case for iPad
- iPad update
- The Blacksburg schools pickle
- iNeed iNsight about iPhone vs iPad
- About WBC: Don't Feed the Animals

Feeling sweet?
Copy this number: 6058013378446529, and then 







July 23rd, 2007 at 11:20 am
Ya know,I think I am coming around to this idea(yours)….but the problem is,very few are questioning…and it probably will pass…..
July 23rd, 2007 at 12:18 pm
I am glad to get another few point. I was thinking the same thing that we really don’t have much to show for it from the past years. Why would we give them a blank check.
July 23rd, 2007 at 3:15 pm
Jeff,
I must say that my respect for your unbiased reporting has been greatly deminished.
I am disappointed that you made reference to comments from another persons blog, when his/her blog contains so many inaccuracies.
I ask you, please review the “real” facts before you align yourself with other blogs.
The existing one cent sales tax was for a 10 year period, not 15 years. (the proposed expansion is for 15 years)
Have you checked the cost of street overlays lately? The rising cost of oil has a direct impact on this.
Have you checked to see what national and state averages are for municple sales tax? (Monticello is in the median)
Have you checked the “real” reasons that MEDC’s many prospects didn’t become recruited industry/businesses?
Economic and community development are very complicated things. Many factors go into it. MEDC has advocated heavily to gain the extension of I-530, which is a major recruiting tool for industry/business. Not to mention the improvement of rail to this area.
And as far as workforce, as quoted by your cohort, the skills gained from working for industries gone-by, are not applicable in the highly competive world of industry/business today. Have you not checked to see that manufacturing trends have declined where the service sector has gained? Thus the recruitment of the Centers for Youth and Families facility.
As for the sales tax, yes, Monticello needs it. I truely wish that the voters would approve a tax where at least 50% or more of it would go into a “SuperProject” fund, (like Wynne did years ago). This is one reason that some prospects have turned away to other communities. Because others have local incentives that can be given to prospects on top of state incentives.
And, if Monticello is so bad-off, why are we the only community holding steady in population (according to the Census Bureau) while those around us are declining?
Did you know that MEDC, while it recieved 2.6 million of the sales tax revenues, that it gave back approximately 2.8 million in grants?
Did you know that the only sales tax dollars spent on the industrial park and speculative building are in the form of maintence payments (post completion) on loans, which are part of the MEDC budget? (total budget of 2.6 million, doesn’t add up to your $1 million quoted in your article)
Well, if you didn’t know these things, you need to make yourself aware of them. Do your homework.
Monticello is in a unique position to grow and thrive due to an environment that has been slowly improved since 1998. To take a step backward, by non-renewal of the sales tax, and a public slaughter of the MEDC and community leaders will not gain us the future we deserve. In fact, the city will be crippled by an inability to fund vital functions across the board.
I do hope that you will again, gain your perspective.
Thanks,
July 23rd, 2007 at 4:27 pm
David,
Thanks so much for your comment. I linked Jason’s blog so that you will know where the “LERG” comment came from.
I am as entitled to my opinion as anyone else, and that’s why this entry was made on my personal blog, rather than on MonticelloLive.
I don’t think I said in my entry that the existing tax was a 15 year tax. I’m pretty sure that was clear.
In addition, I am aware the the county itself hopes to begin some major projects in the future (library, hospital). How will those be funded if the proposed tax passes? Pass yet another tax? Our city and county officials do not coordinate with one another well as far as long-range planning and strategy go.
I stand by my assertion that there is very little planning going on. The proposed tax is essentially seeking money without telling citizens specifically what projects and goals are being made for it. I contend that simply budgeting for “economic development, youth activities, infrastructure,” etc. is not specific enough and should make citizens uncomfortable.
Monticello has a track record of needless purchases (the old high school and WC Whaley) and a lack of strategic planning. Are we to simply keep allowing what has taken place in the past to dictate our future?
I’m not anti-tax; I’m pro-planning.
Again, thanks for your comments.
August 7th, 2007 at 3:43 pm
Iam not for this added sales tax but since I am not in the citylimits I cant vote. I dont think it is fair;the city votes on cty but we arent allowed to vote on city. BUT we have to pay the consequences
August 7th, 2007 at 6:45 pm
I think it was Kermit Moss who posted an opinion piece on MonticelloLive about this very issue. I wish something could be done about it. After all, everyone in Drew County shops primarily in Monticello. Perhaps the best thing you could do is to influence friends and voters in the city to vote against the tax.
August 7th, 2007 at 9:06 pm
On the issue of folks in the county not being able to vote on city issues:
I’ve heard it stated numerous times by non-city dwellers, that they don’t want to live inside the city limits because they don’t want to pay the addtional property taxes, and they don’t like having any kind of limitations on property use.
The citizens that live in the city limits have made a commitment to pay the extra property taxes etc. You can’t have it both ways. I don’t live in Little Rock, or Pine Bluff, or Wilmar, or Hamburg etc. But, when I shop there, I have to pay their sales taxes. I guess my point is, if we change the law that governs this issue, then we may as well completely change the sales tax law to a state mandated tax so that it will be “fair” for all.
Just think about it
August 7th, 2007 at 9:30 pm
Just wanted to add one other thought:
Please don’t believe that all people who visit a city/town with local sales tax do not gain benefits from that tax.
In Monticello, when you visit you benefit from some of the following:
Police Protection,
Fire/Rescue Protection,
Streets to get to your friends/family,
Businesses who are supported with the infrastructure that must be maintained (water, sewer etc),
Parks – Pool – Sports Complex
And I’m sure that I’ve missed a few. It does take a lot of money to maintain these services. Please just think about it…
August 8th, 2007 at 8:47 am
Nita, thanks for your comments, and I sure see your point about the limitations of local sales taxes. Thanks for sharing.
However, you listed a lot of benefits that are not necessarily provided by the sales tax. Most of those are city services that are provided without a sales tax. The city receives income from sources other than the one cent sales tax that was voted on in 1997.
City services should be able to be provided by the normal revenue streams of any city (property taxes, user service fees, and fines).
There is an excellent source online for how cities and towns have historically funded themselves and the shift away from economic accountability and balanced city budgets to “free money” in sales taxes and federal handouts here.